I just saw YMS's video from a few years ago about the Kimba the White Lion vs Lion King controversy. I agree that The Lion King is obviously not a 1:1 ripoff and has plenty of its own appeal, but I find it fucking annoying that his video dismisses any possibility of there being any influence. It felt like he had some emotional vendetta against Kimba and like he had to defend The Lion King with his entire heart, and I'm saying that as someone who fucking loves The Lion King and has watched less than an hour of Kimba.
seeing a dead relative in the clouds is just a general trope bro!
a darker-toned villain with a scar on his eye is just a general trope bro!
Sure, Kimba didn't invent either of those. But when those specific things show up in two animated properties about a lion being king of the African wildlife, the similarities are going to stick out.
I don't understand why it has to be either disingenuous faggots calling The Lion King direct plagiarism based on uninformed comparisons to shit after The Lion King released, or pretending like there's absolutely no way Disney's massive team of animators, producers, and writers working on The Lion King were exposed to Kimba the White Lion and took any inspiration. It's like saying "Family Guy is very different from The Simpsons, therefore Family Guy wasn't inspired by The Simpsons in any way."
Something can take inspiration without being a direct copy. What do you think?