Well, Anon Babble? Was she wrong?

I mean yeah, who wants to marry a gay guy? I know I don’t.

Is this that corny Nigerian artist?

It was probably gay nigger on gay nigger action that's what happens in Atlanta at least

Woman dates a man sporting an earring

I'll take "Rivers in Egypt" for $400.

Just because you tried snogging a twink while fucked up doesn't mean you're actually bi.

',:)

Well, Anon Babble? Was she wrong?

I don't blame her secret gay black men are one of the top leading causes of Black Women catching STDs

Why would someone you had sex with years ago, regardless of gender, affect the wedding?
Unless they're actively cheating there's no reason a former relationship should destroy all wedding plans. That's completely unrealistic. Not everyone you try to date is going to have NEVER had sex or been in a relationship before. Your dating pool size would be pretty small if those were you limits.
And IF they were your limits, you should've brought them up well before you got to the wedding planning stage.

TL;DR Yes. She's being petty and stupid.

Ivan...

No, Ugo Jesse is based.

Netflix's Frankenstein

Viktor, the german scientist is black, of course.

Not even european black, american black.

The monster is obviously going to be the white one.

Netflix spends so much effort trying to justify casting a black victor, that they're completely blindsided to the part of the show where a black scientist trying to create the ideal human makes a white dude.

Man, what a ride!

Why would someone you had sex with years ago, regardless of gender, affect the wedding?

Why would you not tell the person you're with until right before the wedding, unless you're trying to actively sabotage the wedding and blame it on her?

netflix makes a stealth Yakub adaptation.

Also, I swear to gods everyone mind holed cuties so fucking fast, like what?

bisexual

no woman wants this

At the end judging someone this far into the relationship for a prior sex life is always gonna be a fucking nightmare, especially when you get to their college years.
Like, you know when you judge someone about their prior sexual or romantic life? When they demonstrate that they're not over that shit which will typically happen very early on.

No woman wants a dude who’s had a cock in his mouth.

Trying too hard

Unless they're actively cheating there's no reason a former relationship should destroy all wedding plans.

Gay men will cheat on their wives 100% of them time

Why would you not tell the person you're with until right before the wedding

Good question. It's almost like the plot in the single panel comic was poorly managed.
Even if it doesn't make sense why he brought it up, it's a relationship that happened years before theirs (possibly a decade, considering they look like they're in their mid 30s). There's no way he could pin anything on her even if he tried.
The college relationship is done with, so unless he's seeing the former partner behind her back, there's no reason for her to act like this.

women can get fucked in the ass by chad all through college and we can't judge but I can't suck a little dick

Make it make sense

If he's bringing it up now and never mentioned it before it's either because like says he's trying to sabotage the wedding, or he's seriously questioning his sexuality and is still trying to sabotage the wedding because of it. No matter how you slice it the dude is in the wrong for not bringing it up earlier.

Gay men

You do realize bisexuals exist right?

Where did you get the idea that it was about making sense?

Only in the minds of other bisexuals.

Are earrings on a guy still seen as zesty?
Saying this as someone with 3 in each ear.

are you cute?

If I found out my fiance had been a prostitute in college I would also severely reconsider my planned marriage to her. Contrary to popular belief, it's your actions that show what kind of person you are and other people are allowed to not like that person, or want to spend the rest of their lives with that person. You do not get to dictate what is or is not a valid issue for other people. Just because a guy having sex with other guys in college isn't an issue to you doesn't mean other people taking issue with it aren't allowed to.

Was she wrong?

Nigger already experimented with some dudes in college, what's stopping him from turning her into the Human Sharkwesha next?

Gay men in denial at best, plague spreaders to their wives at worst

Why are black men so gay? I don't think I've ever met one that wasn't at least a little zesty.

stop saying zesty, that sounds gay as fuck

she's right. if it were the other way im certain that every man would leave their fiance after learning that she had intimate relations with some tight niave teens. willing to please their partner and explore every inch of their untouched flesh.

fucking disgusting.

Yeah but I don't get any pussy from it

It's a term used almost exclusively to describe gay niggers.

She's justified. He's gay.

If I found out my fiance had been a prostitute in college I would also severely reconsider my planned marriage to her.

Why? People can change. They did something and have not done that thing in the years since college. He flat out said "in college" which means he has not done it since then. He grew as a person and now no longer does it.
For me to judge someone for something THAT far in the past, it'd be have to be a lot more severe than having sex with other people.

The abusive college lesbians don't gun for teenage girls, they go for the bi-curious chick who just got dumped and refuses to acknowledge her own co-dependency issues so they convince her that men are the problem and not her crippling fear of being alone

t. saw this relationship play out like 3 times in college

From outer space?

so not cute

Get rid of the earrings, bro.

I can't believe they are still in business.

Or maybe I can, and I'm just gonna pirate everything else.
There are evil, truly evil people in the world.

Also, did you guys know that a good amount of French philosophers tried to normalise pedophilia?
And where was that film made again?...

surprisingly not zesty

Why? People can change

Because I take marriage seriously and do not want to pledge my eternal love to a fucking whore. It doesn't matter if she doesn't do it anymore, just like it doesn't matter that the dude in the comic doesn't suck dick anymore. People don't want to be with certain people and they are fully in their right to draw the lines wherever they damn well please. What if someone had a Nazi phase in college and you found out, would you also just go "ah it's in the past, they've changed"?

I can't help I'm 5'5

Why? People can change

The amount of change required to offset being a literal whore is so tremendous that I'd be equally worried that such a woman had suffered a severe psychotic crisis and was not to be trusted in a long-term relationship.

Baby, please don't leave me. It was just a phase. I was only a rapist in college. I don't do that anymore. I don't even know where to get anymore Roofies, because my dealer is in jail.

He's in the wrong for not telling her. If you're experimenting, you're definitely not straight. You don't need to experiment to know if your straight or gay, you just know. If he was willing to keep his sexuality a secret that long into the relationship, imagine what else he'd lie about.

just marry a bi woman they're into that shit. not a single straight woman on this planet wants a bi man. not one.

What if someone had a Nazi phase in college and you found out

Refer to my previous statement where I said 'it'd have to be worse than having sex with other people'
Forgive me if this is controversial, but I think supporting ethnic cleansing may be a teeny tiny bit worse than having premarital sex a few times.

Because I take marriage seriously and do not want to pledge my eternal love to a fucking whore

Quatro quads of fucking TRUTH.

I REALLY hope I don't have to explain to another adult the difference between consensual sex and rape.
Yes, if the man were somehow committing MASS RAPE across college then I'd understand her leaving. But the given information in the comic doesn't indicate (or even imply) that

Why are people in here treating consensual college sex as being on the same tier as actually heinous illegal shit?

but I think supporting ethnic cleansing may be a teeny tiny bit worse than having premarital sex a few times.

Nobody's talking about premarital sex, I was talking about being a literal prostitute. Nice deflection attempt, but no cigar. There is no ethnic cleansing being done in the US so it wouldn't matter one iota if some edgy college kid supported it. You're saying the action of being a literal prostitute should be of less consideration than the action of being a college Nazi, which probably just means you posted slurs on this very website and wore edgy Halloween costumes. Your perspective is out of whack.

Because he withheld his sexuality from her. Imagine if your dad came out as gay to your mom and told her to get over it.

gay sex is heinous and has been illegal for most of history

Bisexuals are not to be trusted

How do you know he didnt mean he use to experiment with different viruses in college with the boys? Maybe he created the Corona Virus with the boys and they accidentally let it escape. You can never know without more context.

So you agree with the anon, you just personally draw the lines differently.

Believe it or not, US History is not the entirety of World History

moving the goal posts

The conversation was about sex in college. Rape is a form of sex. I don't want to hear about you saying "No, it's about power", when we all know that the penis is going into a hole until ejaculation.
I specifically chose rape, to show that the other anon's a retarded faggot, and that his argument's logic doesn't work, because he wouldn't accept that a rapist's rapes are just something in the past.
Your past's choices have consequences and are a part of you. No matter what you libtards say.

How many things can you name which are more damaging to society than young-adult promiscuity?

Exactly, not all countries are as progressive as the US

and has been illegal for most of history

That's not true at all, especially in places outside of Abrahamic religious control.

Rich people

NTA, outside of things that are illegal(murder, hard drugs, etc), probably nothing would be as damaging as casual sex.
Libtards will say that casual sex has no consequences though.

How many things can you name which are more damaging to society than young-adult promiscuity?

Okay now we know who DEFINITELY never got laid in high school or college.

zero

The incel fake Christian LARPing is so pathetic. We all know you're just sexless retards, stop the pretending.

The pendulum has swung, gay is mainstream now, bashing them is low hanging counterculture.

He should have told her from the start that he's bisexual instead of leading her on. Granted, she 1000% would have shot him down, but it would have been better than leading her on.

gay sex between men is icky.

icks you

problem sweatie?

Not Christian or an incel. I never said don't have premarital sex, but I said don't have casual sex. If you're in a long term and stable relationship, then it's fine. Because those are more likely to end in marriage anyways.
People shouldn't be having casual sex though.
Libtards are so stupid, that they don't even know what words mean, and have to default to saying incel.

“Libtards” are obsessed with sexuality, but terrified of sex.

gay is mainstream now

lmfao absolutely fucking not. maybe in YOUR circles, but the vast majority of straight people tolerate dykes and actively find gay/bi men and trannies disgusting.

Outside of these horrible things that are much worse, casual sex is the WORST thing for society

Bro. Read what you type.
Forgive me if I'm misinterpreting you, but are you saying it's 'libtard' to think rape is worse than (or on the same level as) consensual sex??

People shouldn't be having casual sex though.

Why? Explain without invoking religion since you're so totally not arriving at that conclusion from conservative religious ideology.

Nice deflection attempt

It's not 'deflection' if you literally brought up the two to compare. It'd be deflecting if I changed the topic but I addressed it directly and made the comparison.

You're saying the action of being a literal prostitute should be of less consideration than the action of being a college Nazi

Yes. It should. Having sex a few times is less bad than wanting other races to die. How are these even comparable in morality.

which probably just means you posted slurs on this very website and wore edgy Halloween costumes

I haven't done either of those things. What would an 'edgy' halloween costume even be in this context?

Nah she's in the right, gay dudes are degenerates, next to women. I have a friend who's gay and every relationship he tried having his partner most of the time cheated, while he wanted a "normal" relationship. Guys want sex, and gay dudes most of the time will fuck anything to satiate their lust. Hell, he even brought up about when monkeypox was a around, that it seemed like mostly gay men were getting it a higher rate than other groups.

What would an 'edgy' halloween costume even be in this context?

Casper the friendly ghost

Having sex a few times

Impairs pair bonding.

wanting other races to die

Will probably never be a practical issue in daily life for the people in question.

Which do you really think is more important when evaluating a potential long-term relationship partner?

It's not 'deflection' if you literally brought up the two to compare

Having sex a few times

Is IS deflection because you keep calling being a literal prostitute "just having sex". We're talking about being a literal, has sex for money with random people prostitute, and you keep saying "Oh she just had sex what's the big deal?". THAT is the deflection.

I haven't done either of those things

And now I know you're lying.

I think most of them would find themselves more disgusted with a person knowing they spend time on this website, than with someone who likes to put penis in pooper.

massive cope. normalfags hardly know about Anon Babble nowadays.

My fiance knows I post on Anon Babble, she just cares that I'm not a Anon Babbletard.

but are you saying it's 'libtard' to think rape is worse than (or on the same level as) consensual sex??

No. You're retarded. I'm testing your logic, by taking your argument to an extreme within it. To show that you wouldn't accept your logic, being used in other instances.
I'm saying that you wouldn't accept other sexual things that are only in the past, so it's a terrible argument to make.
You'd say that a rapist's past is still relevant.
Not Christian, so I wouldn't. Can't you read?
Pair bonding decreases rapidly, as sexual partners goes up. By the time you have 5, the divorce rate is already too risky.
So you should only be having sex, with someone that you'd be willing to have a family with.
Humans didn't evolve to have casual sex, and then "settle down" with one person.
It's either a lifetime of being single or you control yourself and don't sleep around.

Pair bonding decreases rapidly

Oh this is the new buzzword that you faggots picked up, isn't it? I've been seeing this a lot lately. I swear to god you all watch the same stupid Youtube channels and follow the same stupid influencers because you all use the same retarded buzzwords, just like SJWs.

new

the only new thing here is you friendo.

a literal prostitute

There is nothing indicating the amount or whether or not he's doing it for money, which would both be factors into whether he qualifies as a prostitute or not. So what you're going off is merely assumption.
And even if there was proof he did it for money (there isn't) or did it THAT frequently (there isn't), it would still be significantly better than wanting genocide to happen.

And now I know you're lying

You'd accuse me of that no matter what I say. I literally haven't. And you're just gonna use a 'lol no proof' as a gotcha even though it's unlikely anyone on here saves anonymous posts from 7+ years ago to show which ones are theirs or not.

impairs pair bonding

If it happened that long ago? I doubt it.

Will probably never be a practical issue in daily life for the people in question

If I have tons of friends of the ethnicity they want to cause harm (or possibly kill, depending on the level of nazi he is), it definitely WOULD be a part of my daily life.
So yes: a couple college hookups is still much less bad than being a nazi.
Jokes on you I hated that show as a kid.

Oh this is the new buzzword that you faggots picked up, isn't it?

It's not new, newfag.
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10295201/
It's science.
Sorry that you pick and choose the science you believe in.

I've been seeing this a lot lately.

Baader-Meinhof Phenomenon.

You'd say that a rapist's past is still relevant.

I wouldn't. Because rape and consensual sex are still very different things. You are lumping them together as if they are to a T the exact same thing and equally forgivable. They are not.

I’m not sure why anons are tryin to use logic to argue against an immutable fact: women don’t want a dude who has fucked other dudes. You can do all the back snd forth and if than statements you want. You can win the argument and prove whatever you have to prove and women still wont want a dude who had fucked other dudes.

Sorry that you pick and choose the science you believe in.

You literally just pick and choose science buzzwords and distort them to support whatever it is you already believe. There is nothing in this paper that says anything about casual sex, you're as usual just regurgitating a science term without understanding what it actually is.

She saw the Axel in Harlem sex tape

women still wont want a dude who had fucked other dudes.

Women are not hiveminds. There are plenty that would not drop a man the mere instant they find out about a college hook up.,

She probably had trains run on her nightly, so him experimenting with a few dudes seems minor in comparison. And just look at him. If a honky like me can spot the zest, what's her excuse?

Keep telling yourself that.

I wouldn't.

So you'd be fine with your daughter going out with a ex-rapist?
X To Fucking Doubt.

You literally just pick and choose science buzzwords and distort them to support whatever it is you already believe.

So you didn't read the research, and you're just trying to dismiss it? Cool.

There is nothing in this paper that says anything about casual sex

Pivot. You were doubting that pair bonding was real. I was proving that pair bonding isn't a Christian meme term.

ifstudies.org/blog/counterintuitive-trends-in-the-link-between-premarital-sex-and-marital-stability

There's the research data for the link between casual sex and divorce rates, in an easy to read format. Though, because of the website that's hosting it, you're going to dismiss the biggest study on this subject ever done. Not because the data is flawed, but because you're going to say that there's bias from the host, which isn't true.

you're as usual just regurgitating a science term without understanding what it actually is

Nope. You're just seething that your ideals are being challenged. You want to believe that you can sleep around, then just decide that you're done sleeping around, and then there's going to be no consequences for your actions.

Anyways, you're a science denier, and you're going to completely reject everything that I've said, because it goes against your ideals.

Yeah but are any of those women worth marrying? Survey says, not likely.

Here comes the reveal that I actually don't like casual sex. I don't like women that have lots of casual sex. However, more than that, I hate retards using bullshit science to justify their opinions. If you don't like casual sex that's totally fine, acting like it's the cause of the downfall of the west and SCIENCE SAYS SO is some typical r/braincells Anon Babble faggotry. Kill yourself.

Why do you think he was pitching?

He's right tho. They will never tell you but the majority of girls will never date a bi guy because the chance he'll dick around with a guy on the side and give them a disease is too great. Observe what women do (get the ick) rather than what they say (you're so brave and cool anon).

plenty of women seem to like male gay porn drawn and real so are those women just bi? or do they just not want THEIR man to be bi?

I wouldn't.

So you'd be fine with

That is quite literally the exact opposite of what I just said.

are any of those women worth marrying?

I would say it depends on their individual personalities and whether or not you and her would emotionally click. It's a case by case basis with each person. If you find the right things to bond over and you feel that connection, then yes.

They will never tell you

So you're gonna base this on an assumption with nothing to back it up aside from a [dude, trust me] thing?

It's the old definition of "1+1=2" when it comes to yurifaggotry. You are attracted to X. You are not attracted to Y. X+Y involves something you don't like, X+X involves two things you like.
A lot of this was unfortunately lost with modern troonery.

No, they'd make the monster sympathetic yet unapologetically evil.

Women view BL similar to how guys view lesbian porn except even more fetishized and built on power dynamics.
Back in the day, a lot of yaoi or BL typically started with the 'submissive' (see: "the girl") of the two being more apprehensive and gay panick-y until basically 'giving in'.
. Fujoshis have come a long way in rehabilitating their image to the masses and the results are actually fucking astonishing when it comes to the pure revisionism. Back then, you would legit see them trying to call anyone who didn't like whatever they were doing "homophobic" until the actual gay guys stepped in and would say more or less the same shit everyone else was saying.

Nothing he said implies he doesn't believe bisexuals exist.

That is quite literally the exact opposite of what I just said.

So you'd be fine with your daughter going out with a ex-rapist?

I wouldn't.

You'd say that a rapist's past is still relevant.

If the rapist's past is not relevant, it would not be a reason why you would not be fine with your daughter going out with someone. Too many negations for you to follow?

a [dude, trust me] thing

Just saying what I've seen. Nobody can make you accept the truth.
The artist in the OP giving the guy an earring is funny af giving the subject matter, just noticed it.

But while here same-sex activity, although practiced by all, takes place in secret (at night on a common sleeping mat or in the day in the deserted bush), the basic picture changes when one comes to the Gangellas [possibly the Ovagandjera, an Ambo group], in the area east of the Wawihé. Katumua k’ame means literally, “My girl,” but is also applied to the lover and is regarded as a public designation. The eponji of the Wawihé is called among the Ovigangellas m’uzonj’ame and has a similar meaning as katumua.

Katumua, like m’uzonj’ame, are usually acquired in the following manner. A young, unmarried, circumcised male, around eighteen years old, sees a boy of about twelve years that pleases him. He goes to the father and asks if he could receive the boy for a katumua. In return for a present—a cow, a piece of cloth, or about 40.50$00 [sic]—the father agrees, and the boy draws his older friend into his hut. They are now recognized as being in that “relation.” If the older one later marries this changes nothing in his relation to his katumua; he merely sleeps alternately with his wife and his boyfriend, until finally the boyfriend, growing up, wants to marry. Then the older one brings the younger one back to his father and pays the agreed price. The younger now, for his part, takes a boyfriend, while the older looks for a new katumua. So it comes to be that almost every man without exception, whether single or married, has his lover.

Whereas podicatio is regarded disdainfully by the Wawihé, the podicator even being punished with beatings, here the podicator, called m’ndumbi, as well as podication prompts only a slight smirk and is not at all punishable. [...]

The term kuzunda refers to a manner of mutual masturbation in which the glans are rubbed against each other. Solitary masturbation is so unfamiliar among them that not a single word exists for it; in any case, I can offer no example of one.

Why is this sub obsessed with black people

You dont see this level of autistic obsession, over analyzing, or fetishization with any other race here except black men and women

Like seriously.

black people aren’t even on my mind 10 percent of the time.

What the fuck is going on in America and Europe that you guys need to make threads about black people constantly?

Is this a form of cuck holding?

Maybe it’s because Im south asian. I just dont understand

this sub

God damn it did this all start with misreading?
I thought you said a rapists past ISN'T relevant, not is. That's where the confusion came from.
My main point from the beginning was that the two weren't comparable factors to begin with.

Nobody ever JUST EXPERIMENTS.

People still care about you using both in 2025.

I assumed that's the trade off. He's done gay shit but she has a kid.

Not gonna lie, Agent Hot Chocolate would have made a more attractive hero than Sam Wilson: Captain Super Falcon.

God knows what white women related comics would be like:

That's unrealistic, honey. I'm not getting a a horse cock graft to be "a real black." And my family doesn't appreciate you bringing a bucket of KFC every time we go over there, you know my dad has diabetes!

Why is this sub obsessed with black people

Last time I checked, it's not consumers that are forcing black people into the front of everything. I'm not even white, I'm Latino, and we're the biggest minority group in the country, but if you went by media representation you'd think there were twice as many black people as Latinos in the US. We haven't even gotten a goddamn Disney princess yet, and don't you fucking come with that Elena of Avalor shit, nobody cares about a TV show.

Bringing it up so late that they are planning the marriage may mean that he is an asshole who might still run off with his "friends from college" to fuck eachother and random down at the club. You can either assume that's the entirety of all the freaky gay stuff he has done or that is just the most he is open to admitting to.

The sunken cost fallacy is the worst thing to have for a marriage. The thought that you ignored clear signs and doubts because you were too far along in planning the wedding makes no sense when it means years of misery before you fix the problem and get a horrible divorce.

It's definitely cuck fetish adjacent at least. I've watched a fair bit of porn animation, and it's striking how often if the anonymous dude is black it'll be deliberately cheating coded (say, wedding ring on the woman while they rawdog in an alley), both proportionally and just more in raw numbers than the entirety of white anonymous dudes. The only major exception is the creators who just color swap the guy.

6 is too much for a man trying to land women. 1 is like the standard limit.

The sunken cost fallacy is the worst thing to have for a marriage. The thought that you ignored clear signs and doubts because you were too far along in planning the wedding makes no sense when it means years of misery before you fix the problem and get a horrible divorce.

I know a guy who cheated on his fiance a week before the wedding, she found out, and still went along with it. Her thinking was that she wanted to have kids and was getting too old to find another guy. She was 31.

Her thinking was that she wanted to have kids and was getting too old to find another guy. She was 31.

She wasn't entirely wrong if having kids in wedlock was important to her..
Let's say it's 2 years before you feel comfortable enough with someone to get married (it won't be instantaneous), then probably another year or 2 to get the wedding
She's already 34-35 before they start trying for kids.
And there's the whole 'might take a while of dating to find someone you click with' time which I didn't factor in.
And now she can divorce-rape the dude.

First, fuck the graphic designer for this chart for not getting the heading squarely over the relevant graphic. Jesus Christ USC, now I have to briefly acknowledge how bonkers it is that you tracked if groups were in movies or not without acknowledging that a mobster movie in 30s New York or whatever isn't gonna have a lot of Asians in it. The white paper (no notes) is full of nonacknowledgements like that.

In general it's obviously crazy to desire an exact 1:1 ratio between population and roles. But also, it's definitely the Asians 'taking' Latino roles. Blacks are practically bang on, actually.

Teeeechnically you also have Asha, who is biracial North African and Iberian. Her granddad is named Sabino.

...the chart

Holy shit Asians are wildly overrepresented. That's 100% because of Asian money on the west coast.

I dont care about your gripes and moans with representation politics. And theres cartoons and comics about latino characters.

Im just wondering why Anon Babble needs a daily thread about sex with black people or loses their shit about things related to black people. Like why is this thread even here? Theres white men, presumably right wing making threads about wanting to have sex with other men with black skin colors with is objectively disgusting and odd. Even the black woman sex threads are repulsive. Are the people here okay mentally? Its either outrage, crying, or hornyness over black people 24/7 here and its not even Anon Babble.
I truly believe it’s some form of cuckholding. Because its truly disturbing how constant it is. It has to be some white guy cause the thread quickly delved into having sex with gay black men and wanting to penetrate one.

Honestly all of this shit should be wiped on site from the board constantly. It feels like spam at this point. Either make a general I can filter or let the mods move these autistic fetish threads to Anon Babble

also this confirms what I've been feeling, that in Hollywood movies, Latinos seem rare compared to other groups, when we're literally the biggest minority in the country. Large parts of this country used to belong to Mexico and the Spanish. We don't have centuries-old Buddhist monasteries but we certainly have centuries-old Spanish churches! But no, we gotta appease the blacks, we gotta appease the Chinese, we gotta pretend like most minorities in this country aren't from Mexico. Fuck Hollywood Jews man, fuck.

Its either outrage, crying, or hornyness over black people 24/7 here and its not even Anon Babble

Shut up you black bitch

pipe down latinx they're making coco 2.

If anybody said latinx to me irl I would slap them

I thought you said

Different anon, anon.

And my family doesn't appreciate you bringing a bucket of KFC every time we go over there, you know my dad has diabetes!

Fried chicken doesn't have much sugar. Do you know what diabetes is?

1 is like the standard limit.

You get one for passing Cape Horn.

She needs a real man, not a broken buck.

These faggots let good Hal threads die, for some retarded Anon Babble shit everyday. I truly hate this fucking board now

We haven't even gotten a goddamn Disney princess yet, and don't you fucking come with that Elena of Avalor shit, nobody cares about a TV show.

Wasn’t the bitch from Wish supposed to be the Latina princess? No seriously I could have sworn she was being hyped as the first “Latinx” Princess by Disney in the early promotional materials but apparently she’s actually “Afro-Iberian” and I’m not seeing anything about her being born into royalty or becoming a princess in any of the synopses but that doesn’t mean anything imo because Mulan isn’t royal in any way but they still called her a Princess. Was the Latina stuff part of the early Starboy draft or something, or did I hallucinate all that stuff?