This is why Henry Cavill’s Superman is based. He takes all the best parts of Superman but without the autism.
This is why Henry Cavill’s Superman is based. He takes all the best parts of Superman but without the autism
No-kill rules are dumb as hell, yes.
That's cool
Still not reading DC slop tho
I'm also 13
Shut up fag
Bro, your beliefs don't work IRL.
Good morning saar!
Comics are not real life
Good morning saar!
Yeah, but they like to pretend they are. Plus, teens and up aren't gonna fuck with stories that they feel are kiddy shit. The bad guys robbing banks type of shit. They want something with more edge to it.
How come Batfleck was lambasted for killing when Batkeaton and it was fine?
Silver age Superman wouldn't have given a fuck.
I thought silver age superman was the one that implemented the no kill rule? Wouldn’t pic rel be golden age? Or was that batman.
It's from 68. Silver age started with Barry Allen in the late 50's.
Not sure what it is about the 2020s that made everybody get all uppity over the no-kill rule. I was looking at old reddit threads for MoS and BvS and discourse was much more balanced around the notorious controversial moments. In the r/movies official discussion thread for BvS people were even praising the Martha shit.
Cool beard on Luthor. Who the fuck is Xel
I think it was because of Injustice.
that's why manga is doing better despite it also going to shit.
Not sure but he was about to rape Lois a few panels before this
Then why the fuck is Superman throwing a fit? Did he want that guy to rape his wife?
How come Batfleck was lambasted for killing
By nerds.
when Batkeaton and it was fine
Normal people don't care if heroes kill. Action heroes did it all the time.
This, only dorks like Mark Waid literally cried about snapping Zods neck, Warner Bros' mistake was thinking Twitter users are real.
this poster is indian
Who said there ever was a "no kill rule"?
The bad guys robbing banks type of shit.
This literally is not a problem for other mediums. Why would anyone have a problem with bank robber villains?
"no kill rule" is universal for every fucking super hero because they are fucking heroes in comic books for children. They don't execute people. Characters like Wolverine are an exception. You fucking retard.
What about the Avengers
They killed all the time in their movies.
??? The Avengers don't murder people, no
This literally is not a problem for other mediums.
When it's media aimed at children.
Why would anyone have a problem with bank robber villains?
Teens and older do because it's kiddy shit. They don't wanna be watching shit for kids, unless they're doing so WITH a kid.
youtu.be
Shut up edgefag
Anything above family friendly's "edgy" to you, isn't it?
I think they should follow Ivan Drago's idea, you know? I don't see why Sneederman caused a storm when he just killed one villain in a very desperate situation with no other choice, not like he was turned into the Punisher
Bad movie vs good movie
Direct murder vs vehicular manslaughter
Batfleck whole deal is that he was nearly crossing his nokill rule, but he was causing deaths left and right.
You mean the media that turned every kid into a YouTube-addicted gay robot?
He crossed his rule after 2 decades of getting black pilled up the ass. I have to admit I prefer that over routinely committing manslaughter while pretending to have the moral high ground. The no kill rule is too hard to uphold in live action versus animation.
I think Superman dhould be alllowed to kill within reason. Not some bank robber or jaywalker obviously, but if Mongul or Lobo come to Earth to wreak havoc then Kal-El should be ready to take him down by any means.
Who the fuck is Xel
Read it backwards.
Yes, but the movie pretended he didn't.
It is one of those "revenge is bad" stories, where the mc kills droves of underlings, but killing the main villain is a step too far.
He kept Lex in the Arkham as a form of torture though, it’s not keeping him alive because killing is bad. He’s keeping him alive because death is too good for him.