Why doesn't Captain America respect freedom of the press or Charlie Chaplin?

isnt what jameson doing technically yellow journalism?
how does he have a job?

Because he's like the dictator of the Daily Bugle.

Cap is only angry because JJJ rejected his letter to the editor because he doesn't allow his paper to bash muties.

I'm gonna legalize propaganda against this guy.

Not only did Chaplin have the stache back then but also Oliver Hardy

I assume Cap looked at JJJ and thought "Not a tramp, not fat... making malicious headlines... He must be Hitler"

Yikes

such shitty fucking writing and art just to try and sell some hitler nonsense. this is why no one fucking reads this trash. hang every fucking activist retard collecting paychecks. they arent writers and they arent artists.

Now THIS was a good story on the subject.

Nice photo peter.

Technically JJ would be closer to Goebbels.

The jealous media guy who slanders the objectivist hero is Hitler?

Well, Ayn Rand hated fascism just as much as she hated communism, so it would be in keeping with the ideology.

Gangs are just proto-governments desu.

Ayn Rand hated fascism

JJJ is....le Hitler

Very crude comparison to a hard working man and possible insert for Stan Lee

Fscism is just another type of collectivist oppression, of course she hated it.

Her definition of fascism included anything that wasn't corporate. What a retard.

The duality of man.

it's libel when it's recorded in any form, slander is purely verbal

Chaplin didn't have the moustache, his character, "the Tramp", had it; it was an affectation he'd picked up from his hero Dan Leno during the 1890s in British music hall; Chaplin was clean-shaven in appearances as himself

The Tramp was so popular that entire studios were founded to make knockoff movies with Chaplin impersonators and did very well out of it; if Hitler picked up the moustache from there - and he probably did given his age - then it would be like a 30 year old walking around today with an Iron Man toy because RDJ is popular

based

Marvel Comics as a publisher peaked in the 80s, and you can't convince me otherwise.

He does, but freedom of the press doesn't cover libel.

I just like it when Jonah has some amount of nuance to him. It's a big part of why I hate the version of Jonah from the MCU and the games

How different is MCU Jonah from Raimi Jonah?

MCU Jonah is basically a non-character. He exists solely to shit talk Spider-Man and doesn't have anything going for him beyond that.
Raimi Jonah didn't get a whole lot of spotlight but between him defending Peter's identity in 1 and lamenting the loss of Spider-Man (albeit very briefly) in 2 he did have some amount of nuance to him

the weirdest thing was when they made him into like a right wing alex jones kinda guy. I don't think a conservative would be the one hating on vigilantes for being vigilantes

Because he is based enough to know what is freemdom and what is bullshit. He don't stand up for bullies who cry "but muh laws!" he judges intent instead of wasting time with semantics.

he took on Mattie Franklin as his stepdaughter, poor kid

then when she was murdered nobody bothered to let him grieve, I don't think he even showed at the funeral

Randroid is objectively wrong and ignores basic facts

color me surprised

This OoC

Steve Rogers is more like Derek Chauvin in fact Secret Empire was kind of a reversal with Miles killing that Nazi fuck.

It also made more sense retroactively about why Steve hates Mutants so much and didn't respect Utopia's sovereignty while demanding they hand over Hope because the Avengers knew better than those filthy Muties regarding the Phoenix Force.

AvX and Secret Empire paint a different picture.

There could stand to be more characters like Jameson. That are kind of a dickhead but ultimately a good guy. Plays well in levity-to-drama stories, where you'll have someone like Jameson being a nuisance but then when things get serious they become a hero. That's always a good dramatic moment.