Someone brought up the point that this cartoon, despite being abhorrent, is also art. Fair enough. Art can also be a tool for racism and violence. It’s just that when I made this post, the last thing on my mind was choosing my words carefully to worry about legitimizing it.
Some people are saying that the author’s target is Disney and not Rachel because he also made one against Gal. Wrong.
Any child with the slightest critical thinking skills would understand that he is actually defending the original animation at the expense of Rachel’s casting.
Oh, and finally, I want to apologize if I implied that whether this cartoon is violent or not is open to discussion: it isn't.
If you can't see the problem here, you are part of it, it's simple, there's no point in arguing.