Stunning and brave message from Glitch Productions.
Stunning and brave message from Glitch Productions
based
fuck aislop
This post reeks of curry
I'm not going to praise them for doing the absolute bare minimum.
Oh my science
Fuck ai
Literally doesn't make any sense
The only people who have an issue with this statement are threatened by artists, lmao
You actually don't realize redditard libsharts are the ones kvetching most about AI sloppa. Holy shit.
And this is why they'll be bankrupt in 20 years.
I'm sure we'll get some quality show from them before then, though.
YUMMMMM YOU NEED TO BROWSE REDDIT
REDDIT IS DELISUS!!!!! IT HAS BRIGHT KOLORS!!!!!!!! RAINBOWS!!! SPWINKLES!!!!
OTUJGBEOWOO DADDY HELP MY HEAD HURTSHHH!!! IT HURTSHH1HDHSH!!!!!!
fuck you
Who and who asked? The inept are exploiting Ghibli the same.
I hope someone saves all the tweets of anti AI fags once AI becomes even more advanced and convenient.
AIchads? What's going on?
good morning saar
That's great but I'm still not watching their slop
Do they want applause for being doomed to extinction? No one cares.
I oppose AI for religious reasons
I have never seen such potent spiritual poison. Cocomelon and Tiktok have fucking nothing on the coming slopstorm.
Prepare yourselves for a mass IQ drop that will make the movie idiocracy look like a utopian future.
That AI becomes more advanced and convenient is inevitable and unavoidable.
But we still get to decide how we use it. The writing is on the wall what corporations want to be using this for, they've been very up front about it. Which means that the time for conversations and passing laws to ensure that AI is not used to steal people's work and use that theft to then steal people's jobs is now.
You might not car about artists or animations. Fine. But at least be smart enough to recognize how many other jobs they will use this same technology to absorb and destroy, many more jobs than will be created. This is not a transitional change in technology where the buggy whip and horsedrawn carriage related jobs get replaced with mechanic and car related jobs. This is flat-out deletion of entire industries.
Once self driving cars get good enough, thats the entire transportation industry down the tubes. Which is, nationwide, more than 8% of all jobs in the US. Imagine the disaster that is the unemployment rate jumping up by 8%, before even taking into account the other jobs that AI will absorb. You can't pretend that there are other jobs waiting for that many people.
saaarrr
Explain why every fucking nsfw AI image is BLACKED porn, sir.
Worse than stupidity, control. The removal of choice.
Think about just how common it is becoming online for AI to tell you what you want instead of you searching for it yourself. For AI to 'summarize' your google search and telling you the answer to your question without you ever so much as clicking a link to read anything yourself.
The more people use these features, the more people become insulated from reality and dependent on the answers served to them by the algorithm. And as the power of AI software grows, so too does the ability of those who control the data models to define what outcomes you are allowed to have. What information you are allowed to see. To not just lie to you, but yo use your profile to concoct the *perfect* lie for you and an individual, the arguments and presentation tailor made to sway you specifically and you won't even know you are being tricked because it will just conform to the worldview they have already molded you to expect.
Once self driving cars get good enough, thats the entire transportation industry down the tubes. Which is, nationwide, more than 8% of all jobs in the US. Imagine the disaster that is the unemployment rate jumping up by 8%, before even taking into account the other jobs that AI will absorb. You can't pretend that there are other jobs waiting for that many people.
You're not wrong but different kinds of AI and weirdly enough a lot of people who are talking about generative seemingly do not give a shit about any other form of AI replacing workforce. Frankly, I'm against generative AI for the most part at this point but definitely see that becoming a glaring weakpoint in their movement.
Aijeets are misanthropic subhumans who want everyone in the world to have as shitty of a life as they do. Hence why they get excited at the idea of every person either starving to death, or having to work some gay shit job like construction.
I give it a few years before they backpedal on this
Generative AI has stronger legal grounds for fighting it, so thats where people are focusing their efforts. It is literally impossible to train a generative AI model without using copywritten materials and thus effectively just doing something that is only technically not theft because its a novel form of stealing not explicitly mentioned in pre-existing laws.
You can't tell an AI to make a ghibli style picture without it having been trained on ghibli movie frames. Otherwise, it wouldn't know what you mean and wouldn't be able to copy it. Ghibli never gave the AI company permission to use their materials like that, and never would have if given the choice, and that is patently obvious. That this constitutes a copywrite violation is an easy sell, it just needs to be taken to court and have a ruling declare it as such.
based kill ainiggers
Based, AI is trash for morons with no souls
All those artists and not one good writer?
I'm an idiot and hit post without writing up the other half of the argument:
AI cars and other machine learning applications do not so obviously violate existing laws in their training and operation. AI cars often train on driving data and streetview pictures, which are not legally regulated or protected, and so on. But if the generative AI legal battle establishes a precedent that you can't just use whatever you want to train your AI, that the sources you draw from need to give permission or you legally cannot use their work or anything derived from it (which, in an AI black box model, is "everything your model can produce so long as a single picture of ours is in your training data" until proven otherwise) that establishes a precedent of restriction that hampers and slows development for other AI applications across the board.
So by fighting the generative AI battle, you are picking the easiest to win fight that also restricts most other uses of AI.
Oh that makes sense anon. Thanks.
I remember a few days back they showed a copyright suit already seems well underway.
I blame the enshittification of the internet on the global south and people immigrating from those places. Not just AIslop, all slop in general. Literally everything wrong with our internet is because of these people. The AI debate would have been a lot more level-headed if the entire population of the global south had dropped dead like flies a few years ago.
The India-Pakistan nuclear war cannot come quick enough.
what do black people have to do with this you shill?
One might argue that we should start looking at how to organize a society where labor is no longer a necessity, but I'm sure that's too commie for most people here.
The one thing I wonder about people who want AI to replace artists is what exactly do they want humans to do in an ideal world? With self-driving cars I agree that would fuck over a lot of people, but I'm guessing most professional drivers outside of racecar drivers would be doing it if they didn't need a paycheck. Technology should be working to ease shit people don't wanna do, not replace people from what they do wanna do
Stay mad. I hope Americans burn in hell. Great Britain, Australians and Canadians won.
I remember a few days back they showed a copyright suit already seems well underway.
ai is right wing because its anti-science, anti-laziness, and supports traditions!
there is not a single person who isn't a shill who'd believe this
look up the google trends around ai art too
The AI debate would have been a lot more level-headed
The ones bitching and crying about it is "the north". Vast majority of the bits and programs scraping the internet for AI come from big companies in "the north" who are so large you can't really afford a legal team to sue them for ripping a short story deom an authors site or stealing art from a Japanese manga+graphic designers portfolio.
And who's in charge of these companies?
FUCKING INDIANS
THEY ARE INFILTRATING EVERYTHING
FUCKING INDIANS
Most of them aren't, the whole trend has long predated the slight increase of their presence and large corporate entities stealing material/IP without a care in the world has been a thing for decades at this point.
We are everywhere, anon
GET FUCKED
You will never get the nuance, complexity and beauty of a Ghibli film without the human hand and their love.
The reason you had to make this statement is because of this latest milestone being crossed, of the AI-generated result being so good that lots of people enjoyed playing with it.
Now consider that it will only improve with time. If the AI is trained to copy what humans create, when it becomes even better than what it is now, eventually it will have the nuance, complexity and beauty that up to now only humans were capable of.
t. artist/coder who's being replaced by AI. But I'm a realist too.
Literally everything in red aligns with this chart
Mmm, many such cases...
Doesn't really means much coming from an indie studio. Ghibli themselves should be the ones making this statement.
Can you explain how it would theoretically surpass the "context of what it's making" and "continuity between shots" hurdles?
Saars...
China's not nearly as big as you may think. They all use an app called WeChat which basically stuffs every other app into one so they never feel compelled to look into the non-Chinese internet. They basically have their own internet running as a sister network to everyone else
All of the AI flooding that's been happening the past few days is making me really dread the upcoming April Fool's """""""joke""""""", I'm expecting some terminally unfunny
fpbp
You know, I called one of those guys a jeet and he immediately posted a picture of his hand next to an onahole.
Something I've learned with this whole AI thing is that arguing about it here is pointless, because autistic people fundamentally cannot understand the value of art. It's not something you can explain to them, their brains simply do not work that way.
All of the AI flooding that's been happening the past few days is making me really dread the upcoming April Fool's """""""joke"""""""
Oh FUCK i forgot that shit was coming. Last year was total ASS.
Art is subjective, normies only like conventional art because other people say they like it.
I think you can fix that by having an iterative process, a demo of which is that "Reason" button in ChatGPT and other text gens, where it iterates on its own results.
But anyway, I think that's a dead-end: the AI will never shine by trying to create the final product as the lazy jeet ai-bros want it to do.
It will shine when it's given a smaller task that greatly speeds up the production process because it's faster than humans doing it. Consider inbetweening for example, no more slave Koreans need to draw all those frames, the AI does it much faster and with the same quality. A revival of feature film quality frame-by-frame animation.
trying to create the final product as the lazy jeet ai-bros want it to do.
...an example of how lazy these fucking jeets are, couple of years ago in a DALL-E thread some anon was trying to make something that had text in it. The text came out wrong, they were complaining about it. I mentioned how you could easily bring it to an image editor and overpaint the correct text, and they replied "No, I want it to come out finished."
AI as a tool for artists will never happen while you're catering to the demands of non-artists as it's being done right now. It needs to specialize into tasks that save time.
its just a filter
we had these like 10 years ago
difference is the "ai" companies are paying bot farms to promote and spam the garbage so big tech invests in tech that was already available
It's basically always just a question of how much processing power you're willing to invest. There's probably some tricks you could pull by having multiple AIs working in tandem and/or in layers with the right algorithms.
You have no idea what you're talking about.
Kek this jeet is seething
did we not have art filters before?
Now try to find a filter that produces ShindoL style art.
Last year was total ASS
I completely forgot what it was...
looks it up
it was the pretend stock market
Ah, okay.
That doesn't answer his question.
He said filters like this existed before. And it did. All they did was steal enough data of Ghibi to do the exact same thing that image did of pixar style 10 years ago.
The tech didn't "evolve" it just steals more niggerly now.
God, it will be the best April Fools if the comment box got removed and is replaced by draw button like in Anon Babble Oekaki.
MODS PLS MAKE THIS HAPPEN
okay we did have them BUT NOW THEY'RE BETTER OKAY
Are you saying indians are inherently autistic?
Without looking it up, describe what an image filter is.
On a further note, I believe only the Civilized North is capable of using AI ethically, as they're not motivated by pure and ruthless financial gain like how third-worlders are. We are the only ones who can use AI for artistic and/or entertainment purposes. Joel Haver is a good example of a respected artist who uses AI regularly for his videos.
This is what I was talking about. Indians are like Gypsies on a global scale now. No wonder even people on the "political left" have started to dislike them. You have to be a colossal failure of a civilization to achieve such a feat.
why?
That's 100% true, what's the issue here?
idk why you guys dislike Goose, shes okay
Except from the very start there's been plenty of people going in and tweaking AI images or drawing over them to produce better results. It's caused people on xitter to get paranoid and start demanding you to post layers to prove you're not just tracing/adjusting an AI image.
I really do pity the poor fucks who had some shitty digital artstyle that resembles the common AI sloppa styles. Out of everyone, they've had their breakfast, lunch, and dinner stolen out from under them by one side and they're harassed by witch hunters from the other side.
I like Goose just fine but....
she
Because there's a big difference between an image "filter" and a neural-network transformation of an image. The former is less sophisticated and is limited, the latter can be trained to do whatever you want (like making people older, fatter etc as FaceApp from 2017 did).
I never said that such a thing didn't exist btw, that was another anon.
But this Ghibli transformation from ChatGPT+ is definitely not just a "filter". It needs to understand the image, understand what an eye is so it can replace it with a Ghibli eye.
What? The stock market was great, dude. It was fun. People had fun. You wanna look at trash, look at the covid or "AnonGPT" ones.
There has definitely been a mass goalpost moving when it comes to AI. Not over a decade ago people were saying it would be impossible for a machine to create any art piece period. Producing art was the go to to show a robot was human/inhuman. Detroit: Become Human, Symbiotic Titan, the Wil Smith I,Robot movie. Off the top of my head all those used art as the prime example of what a machine should not be able to do.
But now it is 2025 and we are having to come to the reality that making art is one of the easier things for an AI program to do. We have forever thought that art was the unique human domain. But the fact of the matter is for as much as we value art nobody really has any idea what it actually is. AI is making the case that ultimately at the end of the day it is just pattern recognition, and the meaning we put to it is merely our own individual or soceital projections. Now of course this isn't a new idea, existentialist have been saying all things only have as much meaning as we give them for over a century. But it isn't an idea everyone likes. Because the ultimate failing of existentialism is it is still ultimately coping and denial of a world without objective meaning. Some people can't enjoys things existentially, because in back of there heads there will always be a voice saying "but it doesn't actually matter."
It's like liking a nigger to these people. They'll never love you for not being "normal".
Ok sir
how does it get trained? how did faceapp get trained?
Based fuck AIslop
We have forever thought that art was the unique human domain.
Retard, everyone always figured ayys would also enjoy the passtime that art brings to living creatures, no one has ever said fake life couldn't imitate it.
It's just that no one human is going to actively value it like human effort is valued. Otherwise we wouldn't have done so for thousands of years. It's a lack of IQ that makes people worship the unknown.
Not many people actually dislike Goose, despite what the shitposter might lead you to believe.
Still waiting for a non-LLM filter that can produce any specific artist's style.
The operational principles are pretty different. It's like asking what's so impressive about OLED screens when we already had LCD screens.
how did faceapp work?
We have forever thought that art was the unique human domain.
Anon that's just flat out not true
Art used to be all about capturing the real world, or making it looks as if the art was actually a piece of real life, up until the invention of the camera.
Afterward had an existential crisis about what it 'should' strive to be and hence came surrealism and cubism and all those art currents that are about breaking out with the old
And that is IF you take out music - in that case art has been dead for over 20 years since artists have been autotuning for decades and like 7 songwriters in Hollyjew make 80% of all lyrics
I wonder if Glitch realizes the average Joe looks at Ghibli AI art and just uses it for a cool meme or a IG story. The average person won't fucking care about nuance or complexity - we have discussed at length how shows nowadays are made to be bingewatched, discussed for 10 days, and forgotten
I'm still not convinced by all AI doomposting
What manga artists could it reproduce?
The operational principles are pretty different.
Oh so now it's so special and unique that the end result is reached from different journeys. But when human art and machine art is compared, it's "all the same".
AI is supposed to be used in place of assistants and editors, like if you’re drawing a comic then AI could do background art, minor fixes, writing suggestions, meanwhile you the artist can focus on more important shit. AI can be a powerful tool for a lone creator, but trying to do the ENTIRE process with AI is retarded
Not over a decade ago people were saying it would be impossible for a machine to create any art piece period.
and they were right
I wonder if Glitch realizes the average Joe looks at Ghibli AI art and just uses it for a cool meme or a IG story
I wonder if you realize that this is mostly just a statement about their commitment to not using AI for their projects.
i found day of the rake to be especially underwhelming
i'm genuinely asking
how did to work? how was it different? you've explained how llms work but are you just assuming faceapp worked differently?
this is mostly just a statement about their commitment to not using AI for their projects
HAH! Good one.
No, this is just more virtue signalling to their fellow liberals.
I'm not that familiar with it. Go read a book.
They feed it training data ("before" and "after" images), then have it try to do the "after" image itself, then correct itself to minimize error / improve accuracy.
It's way more complicated than it sounds.
i got time
And I'm (still) asking which technology existed that could transform any image into any artist's style.
AI can be a powerful tool for a lone creator, but trying to do the ENTIRE process with AI is retarded
Or what? What are you going to do?
If I want to use AI to replace the animation process then that's my god given right. If you don't like it you can piss off.
You might have time, but I doubt you have the intellectual capability to understand what that anon is trying to teach you.
you're weird
Culture war has completely poisoned the entire discourse around AI.
hi moviefag
floating language like you has no rights
i understand it steals the works of millions
Do you steal the works of millions by looking at images on the internet?
Cope, seethe and cry nigga.
At a technical level alone it's way simpler to train it to draw only backgrounds, or only correct typos, or clean up your rough sketches, than to have it do everything.
It's not a matter of "if", it can be done, it just takes way more resources and is trying to replace the entire human rather than boring parts of the labor.
he thinks robots think and work like humans
you don't have any functioning brain
art isn't something people need
its a luxury and people don't want their luxury entertainment to be made by robots controlled by people who only care about profit
You should really educate yourself before speaking about topics you have no understanding of.
research.google
This study shows that neural activity in the human brain aligns linearly with the internal contextual embeddings of speech and language within large language models (LLMs) as they process everyday conversations.
Do machines and humans process language in similar ways? Recent research has hinted at the affirmative, showing that human neural activity can be effectively predicted using the internal representations of language models (LMs).
The exploration of LLMs’ mechanisms reveals an astonishing similarity to human cognitive processes.
HAH! Good one.
You mean they do?
this is just more virtue signalling to their fellow liberals
Yes, the epic and based "outsider" President has his cabinet post AI memes on Twitter, so anyone who opposes its use artistically must ONLY be doing so for political reasons. Also, they're an Australian company, so I'd look up what they call "liberal" down there...
Except the tech is evolving everyday a single prompt will get close enough.
Yesterday, AI couldn't even render a flower. Today, it can replace the work of a decades long professional Japanese illustrator in less than 1 second. You will not stop this progress.
how many times does a person need to see a stop sign to know its a stop sign?
Of course OP is a jeet trying to shill his slop in the industry
The only future to shit eaters is that, scam calls, or dying under a train.
Jeet or a sub par bot, call it
Their luxury is ALREADY made by greedy CEOs who only care about the bottom line, what are you talking about?
people don't actually care how good ai image generation gets because its bad on principle
The "woke" mindrot is a global phenomenon, sadly.
hurr ur a trump supporter durr
Trump is a retard and the maga-cult is just as real as the woke-cult is.
Oh so now it's so special and unique that the end result is reached from different journeys
Well there is a clear difference in overall capability between the two technologies, so it does matter here. Finding a use case where a more primitive technology has similar results to a more advanced technology doesn't make them equal once you take a step back.
But when human art and machine art is compared, it's "all the same".
I never said that. The machines still have their limitations. They're still the more "primitive" technology compared to the human brain, aside from ideal use cases.
Forever, unless they're taught the meaning of the sign.
I believe behavioral examples would be the most likely way they'd learn this.
Bots are smarter than jeets.
The "woke" mindrot is a global psyop, sadly.
Fixed, and yes.
God given right
How can you invoke God when these AI initiatives seek to replace everything creative about humanity, and by extension, really everything that it means to be human. Whether you believe or God or not, it still applies but with you, how can you bring God into this when you wish to support technology that takes away our ability to actually mirror him through creations of our own?
It's so "bad" that luddites have to form protests and support groups around it. Karma's a bitch.
its already bad so why fight it!
greedy ceos fund artists to make things, but they don't actually make things
artists who work within companies still have the power to fight against the corporations to get their message out
look at 80s movies, a time where wallstreet brokers were coming into hollywood telling directors what they can and cannot do
but they still worked to make things they want
look at gremlins 2, and the thing
look at every time a company tried passing off ai in things they were selling
no one wants to buy ai slop retard
Yeah, i've never heard of bots dying under trains at regular basis.
lol you're a moron
i bet you still don't know the stove is hot
He's a good artist, but he's also a terrible and ill person. This didn't stop him from getting popular.
This is a surprisingly common phenomenon.
God would support ai. Because ai is the sum of all our human knowledge and spirit which he gave to us.
Is it just me or is 80 people a pretty small team for the amount of shows they're working on?
no one wants to buy ai slop retard
As someone who worked in telecommunications, you are oh-so-wrong.
AI bots were always a thing, but with LLMs now? You're seeing them EVERYWHERE.
stealing is a sin
yeah and the companies spending billions on them are losing it
Jeetland is a land of thieves.
Stunning and brave thread, faggot.
Inspiration is not stealing. God inspired us all to continue creating.
A person might care about the principles. People are much less discerning.
why doesn't anyone like ai? we just say we hate everyone and only want money!? what gives
because autistic people fundamentally cannot understand the value of art.
Glitch's fanbase is severely autistic, and their creators are hardly less socially maladjusted, so this goes a long way to explain why their shows are soulless slop
i bet you still don't know the stove is hot
I know that you had to touch a stove when you were a tiny child in order to realize that you shouldn't touch it, because that's how humans learn things.
robots aren't inspired, they steal data
human brains do not work like machines
also i need to remind you the stove is hot
lol
lmao
lmao this idiot had to burn his hand to understand the stove is hot
Is it stealing or piracy in this case?
Anon, you're replying to bait
I'd still argue that the core problem isn't AI, it's studios trying to make a quick buck out of slop. AI is just the newest tool being used to achieve this.
And FYI, the change from the bottom up approach won't work - unless you're already big like Mel Gibson, you don't get to make anything in Hollywood anymore.
And in the long term, depending on corpos for art is a futile idea because it will ALWAYS be easier and cheaper for them to make slop in-house over making original IPs
Even ignoring AI, the flood of reboots and revivals is another symptom of the same problem
As artists, by far the best bet is going the Glitch route and trying to stick together and cultivate a following over trying to stand up to corpos
AI initiatives seek to replace everything creative about humanity, and by extension, really everything that it means to be human.
Not really, it's just going to take away the easy pay checks for doing them.
AI won't stop passionate artists.
See, shit like this is really, REALLY fascinating to me - AIfags are constantly hyperaggro cultists that go berserk whenever you insult their digital god in some capacity, but posts like these NEVER get replies from the shill brigade; they'll clearly get acknowledged by actual *people*, but it's like these peripheral (yet objective) reports and statistics are just purely phased out of the marketing routing - with not even a flimsy attempt at trying to dispute them - that it's solidified that feeling that all of this shilling is the techbro last stand before this shame of an industry goes spiraling down the drain within this year.
Of course, it takes a high enough IQ to understand the complexity of Generative Ai...
Unironically this. One big factor why people (actual people, not bots nor jeets sandniggers) hate AI generative shit is 'cause the AIchuds shilling it are literally some of the most repellent people you might cross path with in the internet. They don't care about creating, nor about the consumer. If they don't care, why should we? But they're annoyingly invasively insistent about their crap.
intellectual property is a spook! piracy is preservation! information wants to be free! *bonks head* NOOOOOOO YOU CAN'T DOWNLOAD MY ART TO REPLICATE MY STYLE THAT'S STEALING!!!!!!!!!! DON'T COPY THAT FLOPPY!!!!!!!!!!!!! STRENGTHEN IP LAW RIGHT NOW!!!!!! HELP ME SONNY BONOMAN
Looking at things does not flood the internet with slop, retard.
Last I checked, warm things don't burn you.
Considering you immediately assumed I held my hand on the heating element, I am going to assume what you projected unto me was what happened to you.
This would make sense, as this entire discussion gave me the impression that you're probably a bit slow in the head.
Human brains are just fleshy computers.
Let robots learn just like we did as children.
Thankfully they already wasted the AI idea in 2023, and of course it was the lamest prank ever conceived.
AI relies on deliberate theft of other people’s work, it’s not “inspiration”. Thou shall not steal.
And we create nothing through AI, it creates it for us. It tries to mimic the gifts that were we given. It’s not an extension of God, but a poor extension of man which is among many things that are being used to claim dominance over God
I never said that.
But the rest of your kind did.
Yes, actually.
how many times does a robot need to burn its hand to know a stove is hot?
a human only needs to see a stop science once to understand its a stop sign, a robot needs millions of images
you weren't a child, floating language-kun
No, the autists enjoy both artistic works and AI slop.
It's the low IQ indians who are strictly pro-AI.
stop science
stop sign lol
the amount of shows they're working on
Two, maybe three? 80 sounds like plenty, especially if you're not trying to meet release deadlines
you don't actually understand how human brains
we don't even have ais that replicate ant brains
Well, what do you expect? These are communities that only chafe when they touch. Any artist that touches AI is painting a huge target on his back. There's basically no means for these communities to interact in a positive manner when anyone who crosses the border WILL be persecuted.
it takes a high enough IQ to understand the complexity of Generative Ai...
Artificial intelligence that generates content out of pre-existing data. Therefore it can't create content, yet just emulate pre-existing outsourced media.
Such IQ, much smort
This is too obvious. Anyone who's rooting for AI just wants to profit from it in the stupidest ways.
Normal people know better than to try and root for literal spam slop to get fed to us.
it's quite literally the exact same thing when the Deekseek debacle happened
when something bad happens in the tech sector it's like there's some defense force that's immediately deployed to Anon Babble to aggressively flood the catalog for a week
a human only needs to see a stop science once to understand its a stop sign, a robot needs millions of images
Not sure what you mean by "robot". You talk as if you have no idea what we're talking about.
There are many models that can recognize objects without having been trained on them at all:
swimm.io
Zero Shot Learning (ZSL) is a novel concept in the field of Machine Learning, which aims to recognize objects that were not seen during the training phase.
There's nothing inspirational about
X political thing with anime artstyle graphics.
which aims
does it actually work?
Guys, rember when NFTs were a thing? lmao.
Life is a damn circle. And it's becoming smaller every year...
Did artists have such a temper tantrum when photoshop was invented?
What is my kind? I was the one saying the machines are limited.
By siding with AI you side with (((them)))
At least people could still actually make their art. You missed the point
ai is nothing like photoshop, the camera, or whatever bullshit you want to compare yourself to
Two years ago it achieved an accuracy rate of up to 90%: arxiv.org
(if research papers are too hard for you to read, see: xcubelabs.com
remember. As of this year, only 50% of Indians have internet access
Photoshop is a tool. As AI is too. And as such, any tool can be useful in the correct hands. Problem is right now generative AI is in the hands of the dumbest people in the planet, the ones who invested in NFTs just years ago.
AI relies on deliberate theft of other people’s work, it’s not “inspiration”.
Downloading artwork off the Internet without the artist's permission is also "theft" according to your definition. Better delete 99.9% of every booru and chan site ever!
This is a falseflag
Guys, rember when NFTs were a thing? lmao.
This comparison again? Seriously?
Go ahead and show me how many artists were laid off when NFTs were invented?
I like AI and I don't give a fuck about NFTs.
Not collectively, as not many people were terminally online back then, but many well-known artists did speak out against it, like David Hockney.
ALsloppers deserve ntr endings.
Yeah. It's not like AI can't be used, the problem is the retards pushing for "replacing" artists.
by your definition
a person doing something is fundamentally different from a machine doing something retard
if you're this behind then you'll never understand
we know, moviefag
a person doing something is fundamentally different from a machine doing something
Why?
Of course (you) don't give a fuck about NFTs, (you) already invested on it just to loose said investment.
a human isn't literally a tool
You missed the point. Let me break this down into terms that you are probably old enough to understand. By your logic, I could steal your essay, feed it into an AI, submit as my own and chances are I’ll get as good as a grade as you or maybe even better if I’m lucky. Does that still sit well with you?
LEGO won't give me Bionicle, Glitch won't give me Murder Drones. But AI will give me office lady Haydee on demand.
What was slavery, then?
a person doing something is fundamentally different from a machine doing something retard
Uploading to a booru or chan site is machine-mediated, moron. You can also automate scraping and uploading to such sites trivially
If only the government felt that way.
something that we stopped because humans aren't tools? are you this fucking stupid?
oh shit, villain mind-set.
At least people could still actually make their art.
Nothing is stopping you from making art. You can eve slap some ochre on a cave wall if you really want.
It seems pretty like it to me.
Sure, you can just go consume your slop in silence in your corner.
Very true saar. AI is based and redpilled!
office lady Haydee
WHY DOES THE DEV KEEP GIVING HER A WEG FACE
I DO NOT UNDERSTAND
It seems pretty like it to me.
because you're arguing in bad faith
The absolute weirdest fucking thing about AIjeet rhetoric is the way they seem to universally treat it as some kind of arcane lifeform that willed itself to existence, is functionally omnipotent (and omniscient), and isn't bound by petty concepts like "thermodynamics" or "economic resources"
It's like they think it's some kind of genuine singularity device of infinite power that will also grow indefinitely because their framework of how reality works is pure sci-fi shit that has to make a fuckton of handwaves to justify it's setting
doesn't seem that controversial, especially since majority of their major players have come out against AI in some capacity. why cause any internal trouble with your staff when they've all pretty much taken a single position on this?
Not if AI gets banned.
most aggressively pro-AI art retards are jeets
most aggressively anti-AI art retards are libs
they practically made any AI art discussion impossible
their shitflinging has spilled over to everything AI related online, even to protein folding research
god I hate this timeline
It will shine when it's given a smaller task that greatly speeds up the production process because it's faster than humans doing it. Consider inbetweening for example, no more slave Koreans need to draw all those frames, the AI does it much faster and with the same quality. A revival of feature film quality frame-by-frame animation.
To my knowledge, we already have tools like that, just far less advanced
It seems pretty like it to me.
Ah, a retard.
something that we stopped
Wait, we did? These kids must be working because they want to, then. Thank goodness!
Yeah. It's not like AI can't be used, the problem is the retards pushing for "replacing" artists.
It's not a crime to save money. Instead of a Company spending $$$ on a new logo, they can use it to pay their own employees. Funny how you faggots never thought of that.
How? It's literally just getting rid of work.
lol, lmao even. keks perhaps.
still trying to leave subliminal messages that ai is somehow a left or right issue
conservatives will never like ai
AL
Artificia Lintelligence
what are you even trying to argue here?
You missed the point again. There’s a difference between making art creation easier and then replacing the human behind it
Closely paraphrasing one essay is a little bit different than amalgamating thousands of disparate images. Do you also get pissed off at hip hop artists sampling old music and photocollage artists cutting up old magazines?
You tell me. Are those not slaves?
This one out of all you posted so far, is the most soulless. I don’t see the demented nature that Gollum is supposed to have. It just isn’t there
Can you blame people for thinking you can be replaced by a machine when you sound like goddamn chatbot?
I WANT MY TOYS WHENEVER I WANT AND I WANT THEM NOW IN EXACTLY THE WAY I WANT TO
We are going to see some manchildren in the next 20 years that will make Chuck Wendig and Dobson look like Abraham Lincoln
There’s a difference between making art creation easier and then replacing the human behind it
A human still comes up with the prompt.
Making the art is easier than ever.
This is a janny-approved thread innit?
Okay so if I were to use all of your essays that you ever wrote, maybe even college papers, and took from your friends as well, is that still okay? Do you still not see the issue here?
How are you going to enforce it? Spy on the population 24/7?
The 2nd amendment would like a word with you...
probably horsie
damn i guess we should stop that because HUMANS AREN'T LITERALLY TOOLS
did you miss the fucking point retard?
but i guess umm aktuallying is worth the time of everyone
lol, you fags won't do shit
you'll be branded as terrorists and half the country will cheer for your disposal
You are not owed people's support. Consumer relations are transactional.
I may or may not be indian, and I oppose ai art.
That’s just telling a machine how to create an object. There’s nothing beyond the prompt
is a person who pays for a commission an artist?
i guess someone who has never made anything themselves in their life would fail to understand the difference
I don't care what anyone does. I'm not going to lift a finger to stop them. I'm just pointing out what is obviously going to happen
HUMANS AREN'T LITERALLY TOOLS
Again, they are. It's why slavery was invented. Because it turns out that humans make some pretty good tools.
Your rebuttal to this was
b-but we stopped slavery
Which is ignorant at best.
lol, you fags won't do shit
The moment you attack free speech is when the 2nd amendment gets activated. FAFO.
Need I remind you what happens to government opposition?
Conservatives (not neocons though) have complained about automation killing manufacturing for decades anon. The libs chimping out over AI is only because it is their turf (art, academia, research) that's being intruded by AI now. Liberals were all about tech and smart homes and crap when it didn't step on THEIR feet
Trump-style conservatives don't give a fuck because it's not really their turf. And techbro conservatives are pro-AI for business reasons
When I was a kid, I asked my parents one time how so many will follow the AntiChrist. They didn’t have an answer. I now have one. The way how people worship elite individuals, worship technology, and actively advocate for the removal of our own humanity and thought processes, has given me more than enough understanding. If he ever does come, it’ll be no surprise to me of how the world will follow him.
trump isn't a conservative, everyone knows this
big tech is and will never be conservative
Trump-style conservatives don't give a fuck because it's not really their turf.
these guys?
That's just moving pigment about on a canvas.
Is a paint brush an artist?
AI is just a tool. You can express yourself in any number of other ways. All that's changed is you're not likely to get paid for doing so.
and countries that matter stopped slavery
Except you're removing the rights of millions of red blooded Americans. You're asking for a Vietnam insurgency.
What's prison labor?
didn't argue my point
lol you lost
If you can only put words into other people’s mouths, then you have no argument to begin with. And you still don’t understand what I’m actually talking about. You are lost as a human being and I don’t even wish it on my worst enemy
these guys?
Most conservatives are not artists. That guy is also an exception. Compare him to what another conservative political cartoonist stonetoss says about AI (though stonetoss views are more extreme).
Okay, show of hands: are there any other goddamn actual human beings in this thread? All you have to do is just reply to this with a unix timestamp image, you know what I mean.
trump isn't a conservative, everyone knows this
that's why I wrote "Trump-style conservatives", retard
big tech is and will never be conservative
I said that in my post RETARD. Though I will concede techbros are not so much on the conservative side as they are on the "whoever makes me money" side
Literally who
prisoners get paid a stipend so its not technically slavery
slavery isn't good and will never be good
its bad for people, the moral conscious of a country, and also bad for the economy
you're removing the rights of millions of red blooded Americans
Not at all. At first you'll see small groups getting taken care of.
You won't mind, they were Mexicans after all. Then some niggers. Then a few white folk, but the gubment told you they were pedophiles.
And then they come for you and your neighbor. Something about plans to shoot up a government facility? My, what plans they found at your place!
They say this out loud and then secretly use it. The idea is to hope that other artists are stupid and follow what you say and handicap themselves so you look better.
>didn't argue my point
What point?
And you still don’t understand what I’m actually talking about.
I understand perfectly well.
What does AI take from you? Nothing, because you can simply choose to use it or not.
so its not technically slavery
Alright, it's over. You did your best, anon.
ANOTHER fucking thread
Art is human
Then what's this?
I'm a human and here's my hand. In fact, I'll give you double.
The funniest thing about AI is that it went like this
Hi, I'm an artist, I draw art. It takes time. If you'd like to see art of a thing you want, I'd like monetary compensation for me to draw it for you. Thanks.
Hi. I'm a lazy piece of shit who wants to make images of my gigantic futa dick nipple anal vore and I don't want to pay for it. I will support AI!
I, as an artist, oppose this, as there is no human element in the process!
Fuck you, artist. I am taking control now! I am now a certified prompter... I mean, 'AI Expert' and I even make money from it selling NSFW version of my prompt on Patreon, for the same price you demand for a drawn image! Take that! I win! You lose! The future is now!
Damn, that's a shame, I as an artist think losing the human element makes the art intrinsically less inciting and using our existing artwork as a basis is not fair when we get no credit for it.
La la la I am an 'AI Expert' making money... Wait, what's this? AI programs are using my prompts that I spent time and effort doing to make sure it looked reasonable without to make their generations better.. What the fuck, I'm losing money from this as people promp-I mean AI Expert their own! Somebody stop them!
Hi, I'm a business that has hired 'AI Experts' to prompt for me, I am afraid after the last two years we've been using your prompts and work to train our AI. We no longer need humans to manually type prompts for good results, we just need our AI that YOU trained. You're fired! Bye!
WHAT THE FUCK HOW CAN YOU REMOVE THE HUMAN ELEMENT FROM PROMPTING WHAT THE FUCK STOP THIS YOU'LL NEVER GET THE SOVL FROM PROMPTS WITHOUT A HUMAN WRITING THE PROMPTS STOP IT BAN AI NOW STOP ITTTTTT!
do you even remember what the argument was even originally about?
Anon Babble is pretty much 99% third world schizos at this point, not sure why you're so surprised
This. Humans are a SERVICE for the benefit of us all as humans, not tools, this is literally what whites founded themselves on to consider them top of the paradigm. By saying machines are equal to man is anti human and thus anti christ. Something only poos would consider is a valid though.
I wasn't even the anon you were taking to, lol
But when you get to the point where your counterargument is
t-technically
you've pretty much lost the argument
It's okay anon. You'll get em next time!
Why are these niggas still just relying on prompting if they are getting that serious about the tool? Do they know that prompting is just the surface?
umm aktually you're gay and shouldn't be posting
Nothing is stopping you from making art.
So why can't it be viable for monetary gain to pay your bills? Why can't non ai and ai companies co exist?
Okay so if I were to use all of your essays that you ever wrote, maybe even college papers, and took from your friends as well, is that still okay?
Basic information, facts, and ideas are excluded from copyright protections in the United States and most Commonwealth nations so there's nothing you or I could do about it as far as the courts are concerned, unless you're closely paraphrasing entire sentences wholesale. Same reason why Studio Ghibli or Miyazaki can't do jack shit about people using AI to imitate their style: You can't copyright an art style
you're gay
God, I wish
(Most) women are such horrible creatures
I feel like the easiest way to put it is that the infraction isn't on the part of the people using the AI for whatever as much as it is on the AI companies themselves.
Namely because where this really becomes insidious is that there's profit involved from the use of the copyrighted material stored within the database.
Theoretically, whatever is produced from the AI would be transformative enough to be considered fair use but the feeding of the data itself into the AI is where things get murkier because that is technically unauthorized use of the copyrighted material
What debacle?
They lied about doing it for cheaper, or them doing it for cheaper was the debacle?
Yes, we "the north" did. You just outted yourself as a 3rd world rajeesh.
>>>>>What debacle?
brown
You mean like this?
Then what's this?
A zoo promotion to make money.
Put a hammer in the hand of an orangutan and it starts whacking random shit
WAHHH!?!?! HE'S A CARPENTER, WOAH!?!?! TAKE THAT BLUE COLLAR WORKERS!!!!
instructions unclear, I need an explanation about Anon Babble.org
So why can't it be viable for monetary gain to pay your bills?
Because not everything is. I like walking around hills, but no one will pay me to do so.
Why can't non ai and ai companies co exist?
Maybe they can, but I think non ai would simply be non-competitive.
Sometimes I think about how the Anon Babble voice cloning project was one of the jump-starting elements in this shitshow, and that I was involved in said project.
Feelsbadman.
The biggest diffusion model is also by them as well.
They just wanted to make their waifus real, man. Fuck.
At least you realize what you have done, that’s what matters. Don’t beat yourself up too much, it was gonna happen anyway with or without you
Big money is showing AI up everyone's ass right now anon. I hardly think horse show enthusiasts had any real influence over whether Google and Microsoft made their AI clippys mandatory
they can use it to pay their own employees.
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
You really do live in a fantasy world. At what point did it cross your mind that there will even BE employees to pay, assuming even prior to AI replacing them they were going to pay them what they actually work for, once AI comes for their position too? And no, UBI is NEVER EVER going to happen. Elon Musk validated that as fact once he became president.
Despite it going nowhere, you guys were a big inspiration to many people in and outside the industry.
even beyond the grave G4's legacy still haunts our existence
Feelsbadman.
Why?
It involved a guy from MIT which had connections to the CIA
You're arguing with the same (literal) bot that pivots into
erm well actually I have the resources to survive teehee
What you type is not the same as what you draw.
Ordering mcnuggies is not cooking the food.
I meant that it brought it to normalfag attention when 15.ai (this guy ) started cloning popular characters like Spongebob, which brought it to startups like Elevenlabs' attention, which brought it to FAGMAN attention. It definitely wasn't the only one, the Trump/Peterson voice cloning was another big part of Elevenlabs, but you know what I'm saying.
Because I'm also an archivist and all the anti-AI policies are destroying my ability to save/preserve shit by bringing in draconian rate-limiting and cloudflare checks to prevent AI scraping.
AHAHAH you swimmers mad?? I'm in a BOAT, It's so much more EFFICIENT to swim with a boat! I'm a way better swimer than you! Swimcels on full damage control, you will be replaced, swimmers!
boats are the FUTURE, no one will ever swim again! Cope, swimtards!!!
false equivalence
Pro AI people are also pro slavery
KEKEROO. You can't make this shit up.
Because I'm also an archivist and all the anti-AI policies are destroying my ability to save/preserve shit by bringing in draconian rate-limiting and cloudflare checks to prevent AI scraping.
Ah. That does suck
At what point did it cross your mind that there will even BE employees to pay, assuming even prior to AI replacing them they were going to pay them what they actually work for, once AI comes for their position too?
Pay raises still exist. If you're not a useless employee and survived the layoffs then companies have a reason to keep you.
But anons on Anon Babble can only bitch instead of trying to climb that corporate ladder to survive. Tisk tisk.
Boats get across oceans in style and comfort
Swimmers drown before even making it halfway
Once again, the tool-user triumphs over the muscle-head.
What you type is not the same as what you draw.
What you draw is not the same as what you sculpt, or what you paint, or what you origami.
Drawing differs as well on if you use a pencil or a stylus.
For leisure? You do you. If it's for transport, then boat wins out, swimnigger.
yeah remember when boats were invented and everyone stopped swimming and no one cared about swimmers anymore
Artists will still exist, they're just not going to get paid so easily.
Boats ARE way better than swimming, and you'll make more money by learning to captain a boat than learning to swim. But people still like to swim.
Is this porn AI?
I like walking around hills, but no one will pay me to do so.
If it's a service to do so, like delivering their mail, then yes you do get paid for that.
And yes, before you say it, drone delivery exists, and atm, I don't want them to drop my package from 200 feet in the air because they are too afraid niggy will throw a rock at it and steal it from the company.
It's so shit, it might as well be.
If it's a service to do so, like delivering their mail, then yes you do get paid for that.
Driving car would be faster and therefore mandatory. Anon would not get paid for walking.
Bronies were the real evil all along
And this was why you got a containment board.
Reminds me of snoot game's
"on top of that, i insult the mods and then report my own post so i know they have to see it"
If it's a service to do so, like delivering their mail, then yes you do get paid for that.
The places I like to walk tend to not have any human inhabitants. If someone wants to pay someone else to do something, then they can of course. But I predict the demand for such services will be slim to none.
Why are yall believing his post? The 4 legged horse show had nothing to do with ai.
You smelly dumb anit-ai cultists have 1) lost, and 2) embarrassed yourself
You should focus on more on being quiet and living good and less on seething mad and fake moral outrage
You can go back and read the Anon Babble archives (look for the PPP/Pony Preservation Project) and find out for yourself.
What you draw is not the same as what you sculpt, or what you paint, or what you origami.
Drawing differs as well on if you use a pencil or a stylus.
Nigger all of them requires your hand to do all of the work. Pressing preexisting keywords and then let the data get sculped from Google images is not the same whatsoever. It's like telling a bot to model a toy boat and that somehow means you're a captain of the Titanic.
Driving car would be faster and therefore mandatory.
Except it cost more to fix the car when it crashes over using a human doing a function consistently for 50+ years.
Except it cost more to fix the car when it crashes
Oh shit, you're right!
Back to carriages we go.
Back to carriages we go.
At least a horse is more reliable than Ai not knowing the difference between a car and a train.
Nigger all of them requires your hand to do all of the work.
You could use your feet or ass cheeks as well. Is art simply a question of dexterity, then?
What about stencils? What about photography?
Correct! Good thing that modern AI does know the difference!
It feels like now there's just literally 2-3 people arguing about AI (compared to what I would assume was like 8+ "people" earlier) and 1 guy posting janny bait
I would like it if they posted some good quality janny bait instead of this souless slop.
They should probably try prompting something with AI, that would be better quality.
You could use your feet or ass cheeks as well.
Yes, you can
. Is art simply a question of dexterity, then?
As long as it takes human effort and passion, yes.
What about stencils? What about photography?
Different forms of art, not a replacement. Aijeets should understand that with their Aislop and then the arguments would disappear.
so true moviefag
Shut the fuck up you protestant ethics retard. Work isn't morally good.
AI isn't alive, it does not, in fact, know the difference.
yet no matter how fast your boat goes, it will not make you a swimmer.
No argument
I accept your concession.
Work isn't morally good.
If people love doing it, it is. But also paying them fairly to keep their land overlords happy is just being considerate.
As long as it takes human effort and passion, yes.
Why could a prompt not entail passion or effort? How much is needed to qualify?
Different forms of art, not a replacement.
And why not just say the same of AI?
holy shit did a ringleader of companies and shitty influencers come together and decide to promote this shitty ghilbi Ai thing in hoping if they all do it everyone would just accept it?
I am a differnt guy. I am just sick of reading your retarded posts.
You are peak American Protestant retard brain and think work for worksake is morally good. That is wrong. Work is work. Its not good or bad. If something takes less effort and gives the same result that IS good, not bad.
Daily reminder that relying on AI makes you measurably dumber.
Turns out letting a machine doing your thinking and creating results in mental atrophy. So if AI shillers seem like retards, you know why.
phys.org
htec.com
gizmodo.com
Fucked up the technology is in its infancy and this shit's already starting.
It's gonna get so much worse, lmao.
No, people are enthusiastic about a measurable increase in technological advancement. In a few weeks the luster will wear off and people will stop ghibli-fying everything.
Like how basic face morph AI was super trendy 4 years ago
youtube.com
And now this looks laughably basic.
How old's AI? Like 3 years? It's too soon for any of that shit to show up. We're seeing the ipad generation being fucked up because of how there were (not) raised by their parents, it's not AI's fault (yet, give it 5-10 years, then you can start to see its' effects)
Why could a prompt not entail passion or effort?
Because words itself do not describw what goes on in your mind. Never has, never will.
The saying "a picture speaks louder than words" existed for a reason. And that's what AI lacks and is completely based its foundation on, limited to what wordie says and then scalps the internet for the relevant data.
And why not just say the same of AI?
I would, if it A: didn't steal from others and B: Aichuds didn't demand the death of non Ai users.
ChatGPT has taught me grammar rules that my teachers never bothered with in school. For free. I am literally smarter because of AI.
You have to watch out with chatGPT. It lies. A lot.
And it'll never admit to lying. So fact check what it tells you.
You are peak American Protestant retard brain and think work for worksake is morally good.
Your body is literally built to work. But to work for others derseves payment for your efforts. Before the dollar, it was gold. Before gold, it was with trade of personal valuables. To say for millions of years that act was morally bad is anti human.
What's evil is exploiting other's hard work for your benefit without compensating them. And even worse, claiming you never needed them to get the result you claim you made all by yourself.
You sound like a commie, shut the fuck up. No I do not care that capital exploits your labour, burger flipper.
Ok Elon. Get back to your X shitposts and X launches crashing in the atmosphere.
Debunked.
foxnews.com
Enjoy sending your kids to the retard school while AI chads boost their own IQ.
it's interesting to me that Anon Babble is basically the only board that consistently attracts the closest thing to actual unironic satanists
well there you have it
they hate artists because they can't treat them like slaves
Because words itself do not describw what goes on in your mind.
And artists are always able to perfectly create what they imagine?
I would, if it A: didn't steal from others and B: Aichuds didn't demand the death of non Ai users.
This doesn't seem like a logical basis to preclude something from being art.
Autosage
Deserved, honestly
porn deleted
thread still up
ahaherm, that has been le DEBOONKED (fox news article about american school curriculum (aka, memorizing facts)
retard spotted.
Glitch motherfucking stole RGB from The Property of Hate to "make" Mr Puzzles. Dumbfuck Mr Puzzles fans viciously attacked his creator in mobs, accused her then 12 year old passion project of being theft and trash, in a time where her dad was dying and she is suffering from severe chronic pain. She almost jumped from a bridge.
That is a much bigger sin than ai assistance usage. So is not changing the design and personality or retiring Mr Puzzles when even the VA is aware of the incidents and ripping off, is uncomfortable and apologizing but stating he can't change the design and didn't make it.
No. They double down and make Mr Puzzles an even bigger ripoff by having him adopt a quirky orphan girl and have a spooky darker colored alter ego with eye imagery just like Negative RGB.
Tv heads arent humans or furries. It isnt hard to make an original one that is appealing or doesn't look like shit yet they couldnt do that AND STOLE THE WHOLE FUCKIN PERSONALITY TOO
They dont usually have the rainbow smile teeth and Mr.Puzzles has the exact same tv buttons and placement, shoes, suspenders, shoulders and is wearing gloves too. Like RGB, he is also an emotionally fucked up man involved with film making who was turned into a tv head. They also gave MrPuzzlesa spooky alter ego appearance with an emphasis on a scary eyeball just like NegativeRGB.
RGB is one of the first tv heads, has been around for 13 years and was the most popular one by far before Vox came along.
JUSTICE FOR RGB AND MODMAD. MAKE THIS KNOWN.
they hate artists because they can't treat them like slaves
Commissioning an artist is closer to enslaving them than using Stable Diffusion
the most curious thing about these threads is you'll see people sing the praises of AI but never actually generate anything in the thread
they'll save images that already exist but never actually take requests mid-thread
also
thread gets autosaged
"argument" completely fizzles out
pure astroturfing
The only lazy part of taking inspiration from that is the patterns of colors the monitor makes
The rest is more original than the SMG3/4 characters that was literally just recolored Mario.
No it's not, lmao. The closest to that would be forcing the artist to draw for you or get jailed/hanged for it, and the artist was forced to draw shit they don't like.
Good, image generators shouldn't replace artists in their respective fields and should instead be used as a tool to help speed up their work without requiring twenty fucking layers of middle managers nitpicking every single detail so they can use that little finger in the pie to shore up their linkedin profile for more failing up backwards.
Total wholesale rejection of image generators is simply the pinnacle of retardation because while you are given the ACTUAL horrors as examples, the luddites fail to recognize the real source of this problem (Corpos and having money in politics means this is a foregone conclusion) and instead hyperbole fucking SCIENCE FICTION as doomsaying while braying it all over every fucking medium and shouting down anyone and everyone who doesn't immediately curtail and bend the fucking knee to their extremism. That there's such a fucking divide when the actual sensible answer is this fucking obvious is proof most artists are grimly elitist crabs in a bucket who view anyone who isn't an artist willing to compromat is the enemy with a bayonet affixed to their rifles.
Also fuck cripples and anyone with Parkinson's, I guess. Hilarious that these self-righteous fags bend themselves in a fucking pretzel as if they aren't shitting on them with their antagonistic fatalism.
Theres inspiration and theres stealing every piece of a character, anon. :/
You can copyright and trademark the images that go into training AI, making their use an infringement that requires all copyrighted and trademarked material to be removed from your model.
If it was, it would just be 1 to 1 to the original
It's rehashed, but it's not a direct copy. Unlike The original SMG4 design. The changes were better for originality but from iconicness it was lost.
We will never use AI to replace art in our works.
They say when they use it in SMG4 videos.
Glitch is an Australian company you retarded Euromutt.
the artist was forced to draw shit they don't like.
this NEVER happens in the art world, you're totally right!
Reading comprehension
Cool.
Glitch will continue to make great animation by hand. And that's good. What's the point of contention?
NOOO THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO BE LEFT BEHIND
WHY DO PEOPLE CARE SO MUCH ABOUT THEM BUT NOT MY AI SLOP
You will not stop this progress.
I have many DALL-E3 images saved. What part of my post makes you think I'm opposed to AI?
One thing I am concerned about is AI replacing jobs and there being no plans to ensure that people can survive -- this will lead to revolution, and you won't be able to prompt shit if the GPUs are being destroyed by the hungry masses.
I really like this image and I shall be saving it for future use. Thank you.
making their use an infringement that requires all copyrighted and trademarked material to be removed from your model.
The use of copyrighted material in generative AI datasets has not been rigorously tested in court yet, it may or may not be fair use depending on how judges interpret that doctrine
Fox News
Opinions discarded
Art used to be all about capturing the real world up until the invention of the camera
Shows what you know about art. Renaissance art and earlier frequently made use of exaggerated figure in point to not be realistic but but represent ideals of beauty or power. And that isn't even getting into islamic art and design that was expressly forbidden to produce images of man. Beyond that art was absolutely used to send a message or communicate ideas long before surrealism and expressionism and other post camera movements. Stuffy aristocrat portraits aren't the only pre camera art you know.
This is so much more blatant than what palworld was accused of and everyone lost their mind over that.
Nta but they were early users but certainly not the big pioneers people in this thread are pretending.
I remember the Jordan Peterson neural network came around the same time as the early pony ones among other popular memeable voices
Ponymix was more or less a model that was just very spell-friendly, even its largely being replaced tho
That's because the copied designs were slopped out without any personalities to the animals you can sex'd and capture.
If the puzzlesman actually had a half assed characterization in the smg4 show then the argument would make sense but since they actively did their homework and made something people liked, no one cared.
That's also what AI fails at, making everyone happy.