uoooooooooh
Uoooooooooh
kidney bean with appendages
over yonder, anon
She’s cute
I wanna give her a bath, some milk, and tuck her in.
well she's fiction, I'll take the milk.
I didn't say you could have any.
I wasn't asking permission.
You should see that two-piece Wendy the Witch wore in that one Casper cartoon.
Did that happen?
Post the WEBM, please.
Iove her extremely chubby legs.
The Casper short, 'Which is Witch'
Go sleep shit
Got a screencap?
How old is Audrey?
Pedos attracted to cartoon children are the same as pedos attracted to real children and nothing any of you can say will convince me otherwise.
You wouldn't get it
Harvey Street Girls are just build different
Is this show actually good, or just pedo indulgence?
Have you not ever seen a child? It's pretty accurate, lil bean monsters.
What is it about the Harvey Girls art style that makes them so sexy? You see a ton of r34 of them and there's a ton of search results for them on Western lolicon sites. Apart from the Loud House-esque thick lineart style and the mid-2000's/2010's animesque style this is probably the dominant Western uoooohh template even.
Was it just the pantyshots?
SHE IS A WALKING FETUS , OP.
What is wrong with you beaners?
Beaners love beans
Ahh I see, carry on.
Maybe it’s you being mentally ill.
Maybe in your fat beaner country where everyone is deformed.
Holy fuckin kek, goddamn, I laughed too hard at that.
Not gonna lie to you anon, being a cunnysseur greatly enhances the experience but isnt a chore to watch, very dialogue driven show that got a good laugh out of me more than once.
reminder that lolicon & shotacon is already considered CP and you can be put on a sex offender registry for it
“Coroners and Justice Act 2009” that made the creation or possession of illustrated pornography of minors illegal in the UK 14 years ago.
legislation.gov.uk
Under the PROTECT Act of 2003, any obscene image that depicts a minor qualifies as child pornography in the United States. The scope of the act isn’t limited to photos of children; it also covers illustrations and renderings of fictional children. This means that possessing any image or video depictions of an identifiable child in an obscene situation could land you in legal trouble.
govinfo.gov
Since a reform of the French penal code, introduced in 2013, producing or distributing drawings that represent aminoraged less than 15 years old is considered the same as producing real child pornography and is punishable by up to five years' imprisonment and a €75,000 fine, even if the drawings are not meant to be distributed.
legifrance.gouv.fr
then report this thread to the center for exploited and missing children.
report.cybertip.org
yawn
148124884
JESUS FUARKING CHRIST, SMITH, GET IN HERE.
What is it captain?
WE JUST GOT A TIP FROM A BRAVE INFORMANT THAT'S INFILTRATED A DANGEROUS CHANNEL ON THE WEB, THESE MONSTERS, THEY'RE... TALKING ABOUT FICTIONAL GIRLS!
Dear God
SMITH, I WANT EVERY INVESTIGATOR WORKING ON TRAFFICKING, DARK WEB FORUMS, AND GROOMING GANGS TO DROP THEIR CASES AND GET ONTO THIS!
WE NEED OUR BEST MAN
SEND IN TINY MORPHEUS!!
Fillmore! I'm on it. ;)