This movie sucks balls and people only talk about it because of the squirrel.
This movie sucks balls and people only talk about it because of the squirrel
The magic fight was cool
How dare you!
I think it's pretty good and unique. Unfortunately, there's a whole generation of Renaissance tards that won't accept films if they aren't "epic" and by-the-numbers enough. Most of the scenes in SITS are really cool and fun. You aren't fit to be an animation fan if you don't enjoy the squirrel scene in my honest opinion.
Higgidus Figgidus Piggidus Poom. Prestadigitonium!
This movie was great and you're a massive faggot cock sucker
It's better than classics like The Lion King and Aladdin.
yeah but I wanna fuck the squirrel
what about that
did you consider that angle at all?
I remember liking the movie, but I haven't seen it in decades. I liked Merlin.
I actually loved most of it but hated the ending
boy learning from a wizard is cool, the plot immediately switching to King Arthur in the last 10 minutes is lame. None of it had to do with King Arthur aside from Merlin's name, also I never read King Arthur at that age so it wasn't very exciting to think he'll be a stuffy king from now on.
Should've ended like Matilda and he goes to stay with Merlin from now on.
Truth Nuke
The Sword in the Stone...
Really... ?
Yes really. Fucking Rosencrantz ass bitch.
That's where you're wrong, ass face. I'm a fan of Bill Peet and this movie is pretty damn comfy. Also, I don't talk about the squirrel. I talk about Mim.
I don't think it's great, honestly. A lot of bullshitting around.
I have a soft spot for it, I don't think it's BAD, but it's kinda boring.
That's not even a stone. That "Sword in an Anvil" which sounds much less plausible than one getting stuck in a stone
Did the squirrel suck balls too?
wow, what shitty taste you have to make such a statement unironically.
Which one?
The sword in the stone?
Or black cauldron?
The latter sucks dick yeah, but the former is just kidna meh, not offensively bad but not really good.
What squirrel?
It's not an anvil, it's a pedestal-shaped stone.
this one, she wanted his nuts
wait did the movie always look this good
mine looks a bit different
Shut up retard
Someone post the human squirrel comics
stuffy king
King Arthur
Such a bad take mate, Arthurian legends make him anything but stuffy, he’s a go out and get shit done kind of king also fucks quite a bit
Filtered
Nothing about the film gave me that feeling either, that he should be a knight in camelot
It seriously went “here’s all this cool magic sorceror stuff for 9/10ths of the film, now forget about all that and go be a boring knight who shits in a bucket in a stone castle instead”
It was my favorite as a kid
Arthur, Arthur, King of the Britons.
He’s literally a Knights Squire throughout the movie.
He and Merlin live in a castle throughout the film.
The entire premise of the film is Merlin training Arthur on how to be a great King
it’s based off of a book that’s effectively a reimagining of Arthur’s early life
he should be a knight in camelot
he isn’t a knight of Camelot he’s the fucking King of Britain
There’s just something about running into a Dark Primeval Forest to start your quest
The book is one of my all time favorites.
The film is a valiant effort but isn't quite up to snuff. Arthur/Warts voice actors voice changing halfway through production is pretty egregious.
That being said it still has some standout scenes I appreciate.
youtu.be
Fuck you OP
Whoa, what a cool mountain!
why the fuck did they make Ector and Kay antagonists
i get Kay to an extent but even then it took him like two minutes to admit he didn't pull the sword in the original mythos
the zoophiles sure got mad
Good individual scenes are just that: good individual scenes. You watch a movie for the whole package, and SiTS just pussyfoots around, has no real focus, has a really weak protagonist, and farts out an ending.
i dont want to fuck the squirrel
i want to fuck the squirrel turned into a little girl
I really liked it, although it could be nostalgia. I haven't rewatched it in a long time.
The problem i have with the movie is merlin uses magic just for animal transformation mostly
first, we are fish
second, we are squirrels
third you are a bird
magic battle about animals again
Who's the Britons?
a race from elder scrolls
I rewatched it recently and it definitely feels aimless. There's a lot of pieces there that could work (Merlin is awesome and all his magical scenes are 10/10), but it feels like they're using Disney's old writing method where they're throwing in as many gags as possible and it doesn't work because they're doing it wrong.
There's a whole scene in the beginning where Merlin and Arthur are travelling through the woods and a wolf is hunting them. But the wolf is goofy and silly and they never catch on that they're being stalked as he falls into a river and gets hit by tree branches. It's obviously there because the dialogue is boring so they wanted something to keep you interested.
But like, why can't it be a character moment for Arthur? Why can't something happen where he shows off that he has the bravery to stand up to the wolf, but it's incredibly foolish because he'll get killed and that's why Merlin is there? Why does it have to be a gag where they never even know the wolf is there? And the movie is full of tiny moments like that where they COULD do something to progress the character arc, but they opt for a drawn out gag instead.
When Snow White had long gags like the dwarves washing their hands, it was still character building. We saw Doc taking charge, everyone learning the proper way to bathe (which they never did before), and then we have Grumpy still refusing to do it.
this movie sucks balls
It was lesser Disney for its era, but it's hand drawn animated so it automatically gets a pass today.